Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3499 14
Original file (NR3499 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100!
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD
Docket No. NR3499-14

Si duly 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy

cb; ee, ): ee

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 23 Jan 14 w/attachmentes
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 16 Jul 14 w/attachment

 

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for
16 September 2011 to 25 June 2012 (copy at Tab A).

2, The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman and Messrs. George and
Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
31 July 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office
with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

ral
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

i a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
following enlisted performance evaluation report and related

material:

i Period of Report
Date of Report Reporting Senior From To

| 7 Bug 12 rr sep en 2

b. That NO memorandum be filed in place of the report to be
removed, as it is not needed to maintain continuity.

c. That appropriate corrections be made to the magnetic tape
or microfilm maintained by NPC.

d. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

 

e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a

part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,

Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the Eoregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

Matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN

Recorder Acting Recorder
5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6{e}
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

ene Navy. 8 :

ROBERT D. Z2SALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3747 14

    Original file (NR3747 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy at Tab A}. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7444 13

    Original file (NR7444 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (5), PERS-81 stated that “an advisory to the petitioner’s request cannot be completed.” e. In enclosure (6), PERS-803, the NPC office with cognizance over enlisted advancements, has commented to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2336 14

    Original file (NR2336 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Gorenflo and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 June 2014, and pursuant toits regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSTON : Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. e. That any...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4968 14

    Original file (NR4968 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. af a CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error warranting removal of the report ending 31 March 2008, rather than the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3355 14

    Original file (NR3355 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the following enlisted performance evaluation report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 14 Nov 12 16 Nov 11 15 Nov 12 b. e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14

    Original file (NR5272 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1666 14

    Original file (NR1666 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1 8S. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1574-13

    Original file (NR1574-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the adverse enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 September 2010 to 29 Aprii 2011, reimbursing ail forfeitures awarded at his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 17 May 2011, removing all documentation of the NUP and granting him special consideration for advancement to ENCS (pay...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3230 14

    Original file (NR3230 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the grade on his commission of 18 March 2013 in the Medical Service Corps, U. S. Navy as lieutenant junior grade (pay grade O-2E), rather than ensign (pay grade 0-18). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Ivins and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12059-10

    Original file (12059-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be orrected by removing the fitness report for 1 February to G 16 November 2009, signed Je copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting oj reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 December 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...